Skip to Main Content

Systematic Reviews: Search for Literature

Step 3: Search for Literature

The goal of the systematic literature search is to create a comprehensive search strategy using multiple databases, grey literature, and unpublished studies to find all of the relevant literature.  The advanced search features of databases allow you to combine subject terms (i.e. MeSH) as well as keywords to construct a precise, transparent strategy.  Search strategies should be sensitive, rather than highly specific.  Ask a medical librarian (mclib@uky.edu) for assistance in selecting the appropriate database for your discipline and utilizing the advanced features.  

Documentation is the most important step when conducting any review. It is essential that proper documentation be record and reported in order for the methods to be reproducible. 

It is important to save:

  • your search strategies for reproducibility, transparency, and inclusion in your systematic review manuscript
  • the date your searches were run
  • and cite any limiters or validated filters used
  • the number of results exported
  • the number of results before and after deduplication

PRISMA guidelines exist to guide researchers on what to record and report in a protocol, registration, and the final manuscript. In particular, the PRISMA for Searching extension contains 16 reporting items that must be included in order to provide the best methodology.

Personal Accounts for Documentation

There are personalized account tools in discipline specific databases such as MyNCBI for PubMed and MyEBSCOhost folder for CINAHL, PsycInfo and other EBSCO databases.  These accounts allow you to save searches and document your searching history.

Documentation Tools

Data Management Planning

Developing a reproducible and replicable search is the most fundamental aspect of any evidence synthesis. Many published systematic reviews are reproducible and replicable. In order to make your systematic review or evidence synthesis the highest quality, we recommend reviewing our tutorials below and reaching out to one our trained librarians. Many UK Librarians have published quality reviews, so they are excellent resources.

Learn How to Develop Reproducible and Replicable Searches

Tools for Developing & Translating Searches

A Note About Grey Literature

What is Grey Literature?

Grey literature is information produced outside of traditional publishing and distribution channels. It can include clinical trials, reports, policy literature, working papers, newsletters, government documents, speeches, and white papers. Traditionally, systematic reviews include grey literature. This is especially important for systematic reviews including prospective research. Below are some resources available to search for grey literature:

Searching for grey literature is difficult. Please feel free to reach out to UK Libraries for help.

PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PRISMA is just a guideline for reporting, it does not account for the entire process. In addition to the original PRISMA standard, there are additional extensions for Scoping Reviews, searching, and protocol development. Below you will find links to various standards and extensions. In particular, view the PRISMA-S to understand how to document and report your search. 

What's New with PRISMA? Extension Updates:

Tutorials for Searching Literature

PubMed Basics:

Advanced PubMed Searching:


Introduction to Web of Science:

Advanced CINAHL Searching:


Advanced PsycInfo Searching:

>

Roadmap to Successful Reviews: Translating Searches