
The first step in the systematic review process is to create a focused, well-defined research question. The question needs to be structured using a framework such as PICO which stands for Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome. There are many other frameworks available, use the best one to fit your topic.
Please review all steps before starting your review.
Systematic review questions usually follow a framework (e.g. PICO, SPIDER, Eclipse, COPES). These questions are specific and usually are comparative. Always evaluating quality. Usually going for a practice change. Your question will clearly define your search variables.
Are intranasal steroids or oral antihistamines better at controlling allergic rhinitis in adults?
Is meditation with peers or meditation with adults more effective in reducing incidence of bullying within K-12 students?
The questions are much more broad in context. They tend to answer questions of gaps in or mapping the existing literature. When developing a scoping review question you must clearly defined your variables.
How does hearing loss affect physical fitness or sport engagement?
What are the ethical considerations in online ethnographic research with military populations?
Narrative reviews can have general or very specific research questions. These reviews can cover a wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness.Visit our Narrative Review Guide for more information: https://libguides.uky.edu/narrativereviews
How does lack of public transportation affect time-to-treatment?
How is generative AI being used by victims of active domestic abuse?